English Devolution Bill: What It Means for Local Authorities and Communities
Craig Cheney
A New Era of Local Power: What’s in the English Devolution Bill?
The UK Government has taken a major step forward in reshaping local governance in England with the publication of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. This is more than a policy shift — it’s a structural rethink that sets out to make devolution the norm, not the exception.
This is a welcome change in direction. This framework could unlock new potential for place-based leadership, community decision-making, and joined-up regional delivery.
But as with any big reform, the opportunity lies in the detail — and in how we respond.
Key Changes Introduced by the Bill
- Standardised Framework for Strategic Authorities: Combined Authorities, the GLA, and County Combined Authorities will all fall under a new, consistent legal model — making future devolution smoother and more transparent.
- Mayors Gain More Leverage: Elected mayors now have a legal right to request further powers, with the Government required to respond. This could pave the way for greater local control over transport, housing, energy, and skills.
- Neighbourhood Governance Becomes a Duty: Councils will be required to introduce or enhance neighbourhood governance models, supporting community voices and hyper-local decision-making.
- Simplified Local Government Reorganisation: The Bill makes it easier to create unitary authorities and restructure Strategic Authorities, while mandating the leader-and-cabinet model across councils.
- Expanded Local Powers: Local authorities will gain new tools to manage shared transport (e.g. e-scooters), protect community assets, and take greater ownership of local planning and infrastructure decisions.
- Financial Oversight with New Audit Body: A dedicated Local Audit Office will strengthen transparency and public trust in the financial performance of devolved authorities.
Why This Matters
This legislation has the potential to reshape the relationship between central and local government. It provides:
- Greater clarity for local leaders navigating the devolution journey
- Stronger alignment between regional planning, investment, and delivery
- Formalised community empowerment as a core part of local governance
- Faster implementation of reforms, removing historical friction with Whitehall
If implemented well, it could accelerate levelling up, boost public confidence, and enable councils to better serve their communities.
Things to Watch
While the ambitions are clear, some areas need close attention:
- Will funding follow the powers? Without sustained financial backing, councils risk being given responsibilities without the means to deliver.
- Can neighbourhood structures scale inclusively? Capacity and engagement are key. Local authorities will need support to build neighbourhood governance that is truly representative and impactful.
- Is the framework flexible enough? A standardised model may reduce complexity, but different places have different needs. Will the new system allow enough room for local variation?
Politics, Patchworks and Practicalities: Navigating the Real World of Devolution
While the Bill sets out a bold framework, turning that into action won’t be straightforward. Key challenges include:
1. Political Variation Across England
- Party control differs widely across councils and combined authorities.
- Some areas will embrace the model enthusiastically; others may resist due to local politics, institutional inertia, or differing visions of place-based governance.
- The perception of centralisation vs. genuine empowerment may vary depending on the colour of national vs. local government.
2. Tension Between Standardisation and Local Identity
- The Bill’s aim to simplify and harmonise structures may clash with deeply rooted local differences.
- Places with strong local identities (e.g. Cornwall, Yorkshire) may be wary of “off-the-shelf” devolution deals or generic governance templates.
3. Differing Appetite for Mayoral Leadership
- Not all areas want or have elected mayors. Extending powers to Strategic Authorities with mayors may widen the gap between those “inside” and “outside” the model.
- This could reinforce a two-speed devolution system unless flexibility is built in.
4. Election Cycles and Political Continuity
- Leadership turnover, locally and nationally can stall momentum, undo hard-won consensus, or shift priorities mid-implementation.
- Cross-party collaboration will be essential, but not always easy in contested regions. The advantages will need to be sold well.
5. Capacity and Capability Gaps
- Even with strong local political will, some councils may struggle with resourcing, skills, or institutional readiness to implement new duties or governance changes.
What Should Local Leaders Do Now?
- Start preparing governance structures in anticipation of new duties
- Identify gaps or priorities where additional powers could unlock outcomes
- Engage partners early—from VCS organisations to universities to SMEs — to co-design delivery models
- Assess audit and performance frameworks to ensure compliance and transparency
Final Thoughts
This Bill is a welcome statement of trust in local institutions. It’s now up to councils, combined authorities, and delivery partners to turn this framework into lasting, meaningful change.
Contact - Craig Devolution Blog
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Blog Subscribe
SHARE CONTENT
CAMBRIDGE | See how Cambridge MC and Pembroke College are creating mutual value through a unique corporate partnership spanning student opportunities, academic collaboration and industry events | READ FULL CASE STUDY
Cyber Security | Ransomware in 2026 is a board-level resilience issue. Learn the key risks, weak spots and practical questions boards should ask to improve readiness, recovery and response.
The #21toWatch Top21.2026 winners have been announced at an awards ceremony at The Glasshouse innovation hub in Cambridge.
BLOG | A student’s perspective on why women shouldn’t have to ‘play masculine’ to succeed at work – and how valuing empathy, confidence and inclusive leadership can help close gender gaps and build healthier organisations.
Where should leaders start with AI in 2026? A practical guide to moving beyond pilots, clarifying risk appetite, strengthening governance, improving data readiness, and delivering measurable enterprise value from AI at scale | READ FULL ARTICLE
We were approached by one of the fastest growing data centre providers in Europe. With over 20 data centres throughout the continent, they are consistently meeting the need for scalable, high-performance infrastructure. Despite this, a key data centre in Scandinavia had become reliant on a single, non-redundant 1 Gbps internet service from a local provider, posing significant risks to operational continuity. To enhance the reliability of its network and resolve these risks, our client needed to establish additional connectivity paths to ensure the redundancy of its infrastructure. The Ask Cambridge Management Consulting was engaged to address these connectivity challenges by identifying and evaluating potential vendors and infrastructure options to create second and third connectivity paths. This involved exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre. Additionally, Cambridge MC was asked to provide recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre to control and maintain diverse paths. This would allow the data centre to connect directly to nearby points of presence (PoPs) and reduce dependency on external providers, thereby enhancing network resilience and operational control. The goal of this project was to ensure that the Nordic data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. Approach & Skills Cambridge MC approached the project with a focus on ensuring operational continuity and resilience for the data centre. By identifying multiple connectivity paths, we aimed to mitigate the risk of network failures and ensure that the data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. This approach allowed Cambridge MC to provide a comprehensive solution to address both immediate and long-term connectivity needs. We employed a combination of Agile and Waterfall methodologies to manage the project. The initial investigative phase allowed a Waterfall approach, in which our team conducted thorough research and analysis to identify potential vendors and connectivity options. This phase involved detailed interviews with various telecommunications providers and an assessment of publicly available information. Once the initial analysis was complete, the workflow transitioned to an Agile approach for the implementation phase. This allowed Cambridge MC to adapt to new information and feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that the final solution was both flexible and robust. Challenges Lack of information: One of the primary obstacles we faced was the lack of detailed network maps and information from some of the potential vendors. To overcome this, the team conducted extensive interviews with contacts at these companies and leveraged its existing network of industry contacts to gather as much information as possible. Remote location: Another challenge was the remote location of the data centre, which limited the availability of local infrastructure and required us to explore creative solutions for connectivity. Cambridge MC addressed this by proposing the construction of a local fibre network around the data centre, which would allow for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby PoPs. Fragmented factors: Additionally, coordinating with multiple vendors and ensuring that their services could be integrated seamlessly posed a logistical challenge. We mitigated this by recommending a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most critical connectivity paths and gradually expanding to include additional options. Outcomes & Results Increased Connectivity: Cambridge MC successfully identified and evaluated multiple connectivity paths for the data centre. By exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre, we provided a comprehensive solution that significantly enhanced network resilience and reliability. Greater Control & Flexibility: Our recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre allowed for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby points of presence, ensuring continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. New Vendors: The team’s extensive network of industry contacts and deep understanding of the regional telecommunications landscape allowed for a thorough and nuanced evaluation of potential vendors and connectivity options. Scope for Future Work: Cambridge MC identified several future developments with the potential to further enhance international connectivity and provide additional redundancy for the data centre. We also proposed further assistance, including a site visit for a more in-depth analysis of options, issuing RFI/RFP to vendors for capacity and fibre, and conducting similar connectivity studies for other candidate sites in the region.
Thames Freeport this week revealed the eight companies selected to participate in the Freeport’s Connectivity Lab, an initiative focused on validating commercially proven technologies in live port and logistics environments.
Emerging as a hub for innovation, Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and transform the lives of people in its region. Leveraging global connectivity and occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to drive economic regeneration for the local area. Thames Freeport engaged Cambridge Management Consulting to design a clear strategy for innovation over the next three to five years. Key considerations for this innovation strategy included objectives and KPIs, the future of the business ecosystem in the region, physical clusters and assets such as innovation hubs, and opportunities and challenges on the way. The Solution Working with our innovation partner, L Marks, Cambridge MC conducted an innovation strategy project which involved the following: Engaging with a range of stakeholders and partners from local authorities to corporate partners across the Thames Freeport area, leveraging interviews with key individuals to build a common picture of innovation aspirations, opportunities, and challenges. Conducting a series of workshops for the Thames Freeport team to consider visions and objectives, themes and focus areas, physical hubs and overall programme structure, and a three-year roadmap plan. Building a comprehensive innovation strategy which internalised all of the above questions. This was then presented to their board and formed the basis of the public tenders for innovation programmes that were then made public.
