Supply Chain Engagement Will Make Your Business Stronger

Simon King


Subscribe Contact us

Don't Fear Scope 3, Embrace It


Momentum is vital if you want to deliver an effective and on-time sustainability strategy. But it’s often a challenge for organisations to create. As time ticks on, your teams face a mountain that gets steeper and steeper. This inevitably causes a ‘rabbit in the headlights’ effect, intensified by business resource shortages and diary backlogs. The longer you leave it, the steeper that curve gets.

 

First, you must quantify the size of the task ahead: where have you set the boundaries and what is the 'Scope' you have signed up to? Every strategy is different, as no industry is the same. No matter what sector your company sits in and no matter how well you think you know your business, capturing the right data in a timely and effective manner, and harnessing ‘momentum’, brings many challenges. 


That said, there are ways to make this process focussed and more efficient. We will explain more below, but first let’s start with a definition of the three Scopes and your responsibilities as a business.


What are the Three Scopes?


The Greenhouse Gas Protocol divides emissions in three categories:


Scope 1: Emissions released directly from a business


Scope 2: Indirect emissions released from the energy purchased by an organisation


Scope 3: Indirect emissions, accounting for upstream and downstream emissions from a product or service and emissions across your supply chain


As a business, Scope 1 and Scope 2 are pretty much in your control: you own the data and to a certain extent have control of the people and processes. Scope 3 can put fear into even the most experienced sustainability professional.


Why the Fear?


It's big: At least 90% of your overall footprint and in some instances even more, depending on the industry


It's hard to organise: It can be a bit like 'herding sheep'. You have multiple suppliers from potentially different sectors, different attitudes to sustainability, and different stages of 'carbon maturity'.


It's complicated: Some will have data, some will not. It might be very manual at the start. Your suppliers might be in different countries, speak different languages and have different legislation. How do you summarise your findings to give them value?


Ultimately, this is the right thing to do. A net zero strategy which covers Scope 3 communicates clear intent to make a difference to the way you operate. Tackling Scope 3 will embed sustainability into your overall culture and BAU operations sooner rather than later; before the mountain becomes too steep.


A Three-Step Approach


If your organisation doesn’t cover Scope 3 in your targets don't immediately worry; but do start planning to extend your horizons. If you do have it embedded in your targets but haven’t engaged with your supply chain, once again don't panic.


Below are a few simple thoughts on how to achieve your goals and thrive in the process.


Step One: Be Organised


As with most things we deal with in the world of energy and sustainability, if you don't know the start position, how will you know what you've achieved? Scope 3 is an enormous element of your overall carbon footprint, so you need to understand the problem in detail.


This can be done through realistic assumptions and estimates to start with, but ultimately going straight to the source and asking 'simple' and straightforward questions is going to be the most effective way of building clear data sets. We would like to emphasise the word 'simple'. You don't want to turn suppliers off before you've even started. Build 'data confidence' over time.


Start with a simple survey, which takes no more than 10 minutes to complete. Then build from this starting point. Once you have a base line of information, you can progressively expand the questions over time.


Step Two: Be Engaged


Using data requests in a new procurement process is an effective way of gaining the data quickly. However, engaging with an already established supplier is a slightly different process. Demanding that legacy suppliers give you 100 separate pieces of data by next week might work, but it is likely to damage a relationship rather than enhance it.


We are finding that organisations who outline their own intention for net zero and why they are asking for this information will get better long-term results from their supply base. This moves it from a purely transactional relationship to one which is a true embedded partnership.


If you can articulate what you need and why, it's amazing what suppliers will do. If you can’t do this then, you don’t have a well-considered plan.


Step Three: Be Consistent


Have a plan and let your suppliers know about it. Tell them what you are doing and what has worked in the past and what hasn't. Achieving net zero is a multi-layered process and one which will have many twists and turns along the way. Your customers will demand change and your supply chain needs to be aware of it. This will take time and needs continuous focus. Don't expect it to happen overnight.


Bring structure to your plan. Examples of how this can be done are:


  • Creating a simple and easy data capture process (preferably an online platform rather than spreadsheets)
  • Create sustainability forums with suppliers included
  • Build a communication hub outlining key achievements and announcements
  • Ring fence green 'funds' to subsidies capex programmes
  • Develop joint community events across your business regions


These actions will ease the pain and really move things forward for your engagement plan.


It isn't Easy, but the Rewards are Huge


One thing is for certain, sustainability and carbon reduction programmes will become part of standard business practice. If they are not embedded into BAU operations, customers and policymakers will make it very hard for organisations to remain financially viable.


There is a business need to create true joined up engagement across the whole supply chain. Increasing dialogue and forming a common link between each organisation in your network of businesses can only improve your ability to adapt to change through the sharing of innovative ideas and building true partnerships.


If you would like to speak to our sustainability team about effective steps to implement Supply Chain Engagement programmes, go to our Sustainability page here.


Contact - AI at the Edge article

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Blog Subscribe

SHARE CONTENT

Pembroke College lawn bathed in sunlight
by Tim Passingham 12 March 2026
CAMBRIDGE | See how Cambridge MC and Pembroke College are creating mutual value through a unique corporate partnership spanning student opportunities, academic collaboration and industry events | READ FULL CASE STUDY
Neon sharks made out of code.
by Simon Crimp 9 March 2026
Cyber Security | Ransomware in 2026 is a board-level resilience issue. Learn the key risks, weak spots and practical questions boards should ask to improve readiness, recovery and response.
The Top 21.2026 at the awards event in Cambridge, UK.
6 March 2026
The #21toWatch Top21.2026 winners have been announced at an awards ceremony at The Glasshouse innovation hub in Cambridge.
Asian business woman near a long window and looking at a tablet.
by Arianna Mortali 6 March 2026
BLOG | A student’s perspective on why women shouldn’t have to ‘play masculine’ to succeed at work – and how valuing empathy, confidence and inclusive leadership can help close gender gaps and build healthier organisations.
Abstract squiggle of circles
by Simon Crimp 19 February 2026
Where should leaders start with AI in 2026? A practical guide to moving beyond pilots, clarifying risk appetite, strengthening governance, improving data readiness, and delivering measurable enterprise value from AI at scale | READ FULL ARTICLE
Close up of a data centre stack with ports and wires visible
12 February 2026
We were approached by one of the fastest growing data centre providers in Europe. With over 20 data centres throughout the continent, they are consistently meeting the need for scalable, high-performance infrastructure. Despite this, a key data centre in Scandinavia had become reliant on a single, non-redundant 1 Gbps internet service from a local provider, posing significant risks to operational continuity. To enhance the reliability of its network and resolve these risks, our client needed to establish additional connectivity paths to ensure the redundancy of its infrastructure. The Ask Cambridge Management Consulting was engaged to address these connectivity challenges by identifying and evaluating potential vendors and infrastructure options to create second and third connectivity paths. This involved exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre. Additionally, Cambridge MC was asked to provide recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre to control and maintain diverse paths. This would allow the data centre to connect directly to nearby points of presence (PoPs) and reduce dependency on external providers, thereby enhancing network resilience and operational control. The goal of this project was to ensure that the Nordic data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. Approach & Skills Cambridge MC approached the project with a focus on ensuring operational continuity and resilience for the data centre. By identifying multiple connectivity paths, we aimed to mitigate the risk of network failures and ensure that the data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. This approach allowed Cambridge MC to provide a comprehensive solution to address both immediate and long-term connectivity needs. We employed a combination of Agile and Waterfall methodologies to manage the project. The initial investigative phase allowed a Waterfall approach, in which our team conducted thorough research and analysis to identify potential vendors and connectivity options. This phase involved detailed interviews with various telecommunications providers and an assessment of publicly available information. Once the initial analysis was complete, the workflow transitioned to an Agile approach for the implementation phase. This allowed Cambridge MC to adapt to new information and feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that the final solution was both flexible and robust. Challenges Lack of information: One of the primary obstacles we faced was the lack of detailed network maps and information from some of the potential vendors. To overcome this, the team conducted extensive interviews with contacts at these companies and leveraged its existing network of industry contacts to gather as much information as possible. Remote location: Another challenge was the remote location of the data centre, which limited the availability of local infrastructure and required us to explore creative solutions for connectivity. Cambridge MC addressed this by proposing the construction of a local fibre network around the data centre, which would allow for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby PoPs. Fragmented factors: Additionally, coordinating with multiple vendors and ensuring that their services could be integrated seamlessly posed a logistical challenge. We mitigated this by recommending a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most critical connectivity paths and gradually expanding to include additional options. Outcomes & Results Increased Connectivity: Cambridge MC successfully identified and evaluated multiple connectivity paths for the data centre. By exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre, we provided a comprehensive solution that significantly enhanced network resilience and reliability. Greater Control & Flexibility: Our recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre allowed for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby points of presence, ensuring continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. New Vendors: The team’s extensive network of industry contacts and deep understanding of the regional telecommunications landscape allowed for a thorough and nuanced evaluation of potential vendors and connectivity options. Scope for Future Work: Cambridge MC identified several future developments with the potential to further enhance international connectivity and provide additional redundancy for the data centre. We also proposed further assistance, including a site visit for a more in-depth analysis of options, issuing RFI/RFP to vendors for capacity and fibre, and conducting similar connectivity studies for other candidate sites in the region.
Neon discs fading from blue to green to purple, cascading diagnolly across the screen.
by Cambridge Management Consulting 28 January 2026
Thames Freeport this week revealed the eight companies selected to participate in the Freeport’s Connectivity Lab, an initiative focused on validating commercially proven technologies in live port and logistics environments.
Aerial view of a data centre warehouse in the English countryside
by Duncan Clubb 13 January 2026
Author
by Matt Lawson 2 January 2026
Emerging as a hub for innovation, Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and transform the lives of people in its region. Leveraging global connectivity and occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to drive economic regeneration for the local area. Thames Freeport engaged Cambridge Management Consulting to design a clear strategy for innovation over the next three to five years. Key considerations for this innovation strategy included objectives and KPIs, the future of the business ecosystem in the region, physical clusters and assets such as innovation hubs, and opportunities and challenges on the way. The Solution Working with our innovation partner, L Marks, Cambridge MC conducted an innovation strategy project which involved the following: Engaging with a range of stakeholders and partners from local authorities to corporate partners across the Thames Freeport area, leveraging interviews with key individuals to build a common picture of innovation aspirations, opportunities, and challenges. Conducting a series of workshops for the Thames Freeport team to consider visions and objectives, themes and focus areas, physical hubs and overall programme structure, and a three-year roadmap plan. Building a comprehensive innovation strategy which internalised all of the above questions. This was then presented to their board and formed the basis of the public tenders for innovation programmes that were then made public. 
More posts