The Cost of Short-Termism: Why Ignoring Sustainability Erodes Business Value

Scott Armstrong

SUBSCRIBE CONTACT US

Author


A World on Fire as Businesses Look Away

In the wake of stark warnings from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the need for nations and businesses to expedite climate action has never been more urgent. Yet 2024 offered a sobering backdrop. More than 60 countries went to the polls, including the US, UK, India, South Africa, Pakistan, and Russia, but climate scarcely featured in their manifestos.


Global temperatures soared, making 2024 the hottest year on record, breaching the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C threshold with an average global rise of 1.6°C. Instead of urgency, we saw political backtracking and rising public scepticism, as nationalist politics reshaped climate discourse.


Against this backdrop, businesses are echoing the same short-termism. In 2025, the focus has shifted toward low-value investments and fast paybacks rather than the long-term strategies needed for net zero. Governments and businesses alike are kicking the climate can down the road just when decisive action is most needed.


Taking a long-term view on sustainability, particularly decarbonisation, delivers significant benefits, increases company valuation, and supports growth.

Short-term Thinking Has Taken Hold

Shareholder expectations and competitive pressures have always shaped decision-making. But what we now see is a narrowing of focus. Instead of aligning investment with the multi-decade challenge of decarbonisation, many firms prioritise projects with immediate returns, often within a 2–3-year window.


This is dangerous because:


  • The reporting landscape is tightening: Regulations such as the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the UK’s Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT), and International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) alignment are forcing greater transparency. But disclosure is not action.


  • The transition window is closing: Science shows emissions must peak before 2030 and fall nearly half by 2035. Short-term finance cycles are incompatible with this.


  • Competitive positioning is at risk: Companies that delay risk stranded assets, supply chain disruption, and reputational damage as customers and investors demand resilience.

The Retreat from Net Zero: Sentiment vs Reality

Across boardrooms in 2025, enthusiasm for net zero is cooling. Where once CEOs boasted of ambitious targets, now there is widespread retreat.


  • Economic volatility: Inflation, higher interest rates, and supply chain disruption push firms to defer sustainability projects.


  • Investor pressure: Mainstream investors still reward quarterly earnings, not 2040 climate goals.


  • Political cover: With governments slowing ambition, businesses feel less exposed when reducing their own commitments.


This sentiment shift is dangerous. Net zero is not just good PR but a structural transition. Companies stepping back risk missing climate targets and financial benefits.

Why Short-term Planning Fails

  1. Misaligned Investment Horizons: Sustainability requires investments that yield over decades. Projects like renewable infrastructure or efficiency retrofits often need 7–15 years for ROI. 2–3-year payback criteria exclude exactly the projects that build resilience.

  2. Greenwashing Over Governance: Short-term optics - branding, offsets, marginal improvements – are favoured over transformation. Trust erodes among investors, employees, and consumers.

  3. Regulatory Lag Becomes Risk Exposure: Carbon disclosure requirements are accelerating. Businesses unprepared for compliance will face costs, penalties, and reputational harm.

  4. Failure to Secure Financing: Lenders increasingly evaluate transition risk. Firms without credible long-term plans will pay higher financing costs or lose access to capital.

The Case for Long-term Value

Research shows sustainability and profitability are not mutually exclusive:


  • Higher returns: ESG-aligned portfolios have outperformed benchmarks over the past decade.


  • Company valuation: Investment in carbon reduction and efficiency raises asset value and valuation multiples.


  • Resilience: Firms that invested early in renewables benefit from reduced exposure to fossil fuel volatility.


  • Investor sentiment: Global frameworks like the UN COP26 initiated Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) embed climate criteria into long-term capital allocation.


The lesson: businesses that look beyond immediate paybacks are better positioned to attract capital, manage risk, and capture growth opportunities.

How Businesses Must Reframe Sustainability

To break from short-termism, businesses should adopt three principles:


  • Transition Planning as Strategy: Carbon disclosures must be integrated into long-term strategy, aligning investments and risk management around net zero.


  • Evolving Investment Criteria: Payback periods should include avoided carbon costs, resilience, brand equity, and financing conditions – embracing total value, not just financial return.


  • Aligning Incentives: Boards should link executive compensation not only to annual results but to long-term climate and sustainability delivery.


Conclusion: Choosing Lasting Value over Quick Wins

"

A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.”


— Greek Proverb

The world in 2025 is defined by contradiction. The climate crisis accelerates, yet business sentiment retreats into short-term paybacks.


This is unsustainable. Businesses that chase immediate returns risk competitiveness, resilience, and relevance. Those that embrace sustainability as core strategy will unlock profitability, resilience, and trust.


Pushing this problem into the long grass only makes the future more expensive – for businesses, investors, and society alike. The choice is clear: chase short-term gains or invest in lasting value.

Get in Touch

If you are working in a sustainability role or hold a senior role within an organisation and the topic of this insight article resonates with you, please come and talk to us at edenseven. We are a business of practical thinking individuals who have real life experience of working in and running businesses.


We understand the pressures of hitting short-term targets but also the huge benefits a well-structured decarbonisation strategy can have on your business. If you want to talk more, please get in touch using the contact form below.

Contact Form

Contact - Craig Devolution Blog

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Blog Subscribe

SHARE CONTENT

Two blocks of data with bottleneck inbetween
by Paul Brooker 29 October 2025
Read our article on hidden complexity and find out how shadow IT, duplicate tools and siloed buying bloat costs. See how CIOs gain a single view of IT spend to cut waste, boost compliance and unlock 5–7% annual savings | READ FULL ARTICLE
Neon 'Open' sign in business window
by Tom Burton 9 October 2025
SMEs make up 99% of UK businesses, three fifths of employment, over 50% of all business revenue, are in everyone's supply chain, and are exposed to largely the same threats as large enterprises. How should they get started with cyber security? Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SME) are not immune to the threat of cyber attacks. At the very least, if your business has money then it will be attractive to criminals. And even if you don’t have anything of value, you may still get caught up in a ransomware campaign with all of your data and systems made inaccessible. Unfortunately many SMEs do not have an IT team let alone a cyber security team. It may not be obvious where to start, but inaction can have significant impact on your business by both increasing risk and reducing the confidence to address new opportunities. In this article we outline 5 key questions that can help SMEs to understand what they need to do. Even if you outsource your IT to a supplier these questions are still relevant. Some can’t be delegated, and others are topics for discussion so that you can ensure your service provider is doing the right things, as well as understanding where their responsibilities stop and yours start. Q1: What's Important & Worth Defending Not everything needs protecting equally. In your personal life you will have some possessions that are dear to you and others that you are more laissez-faire about. The same applies to your digital assets, and the start point for any security plan needs to be an audit of the things you own and their importance to your business. Those ‘things’, or assets, may be particular types of data or information. For instance, you may have sensitive intellectual property or trade secrets; you may hold information about your customers that is governed by privacy regulations; or your financial data may be of particular concern. Some of this information needs to be protected from theft, while it may be more important to prevent other types of data from being modified or deleted. It is helpful to build a list of these assets, and their characteristics like the table below:
Illustration of EV sensor fields
by Duncan Clubb 25 September 2025
Explore the rise of edge AI: smaller data centres, faster networks, and sustainable power solutions. See why the future of digital infrastructure is distributed and intelligent | READ FULL ARTICLE
A close-up of the Downing St sign
by Craig Cheney 19 September 2025
Craig Cheney | The conversation around artificial intelligence (AI) in Government has shifted in recent years. The publication of the UK Government’s AI Playbook represents more than just updated guidance — it signals a huge shift in the government's approach to AI.
Close up of electricity pylon
by Duncan Clubb 17 September 2025
The UK’s AI ambitions face gridlock. Discover how power shortages, costly electricity, and rack density challenges threaten data centre growth – and what’s being done | READ FULL ARTICLE
Abstract neon hexagons
by Tom Burton 17 September 2025
Delaying cybersecurity puts startups at risk. Discover how early safeguards boost investor confidence, customer trust, and long-term business resilience | READ FULL ARTICLE
Neon wave
by Anthony Aarons 16 September 2025
An in-depth look at AI risk and governance: OECD frameworks, EU AI Act, and UK/US strategies reveal how nations balance innovation with safety and accountability | READ NOW
More posts