The Cost of Short-Termism: Why Ignoring Sustainability Erodes Business Value

Scott Armstrong

SUBSCRIBE CONTACT US

Author


A World on Fire as Businesses Look Away

In the wake of stark warnings from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the need for nations and businesses to expedite climate action has never been more urgent. Yet 2024 offered a sobering backdrop. More than 60 countries went to the polls, including the US, UK, India, South Africa, Pakistan, and Russia, but climate scarcely featured in their manifestos.


Global temperatures soared, making 2024 the hottest year on record, breaching the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C threshold with an average global rise of 1.6°C. Instead of urgency, we saw political backtracking and rising public scepticism, as nationalist politics reshaped climate discourse.


Against this backdrop, businesses are echoing the same short-termism. In 2025, the focus has shifted toward low-value investments and fast paybacks rather than the long-term strategies needed for net zero. Governments and businesses alike are kicking the climate can down the road just when decisive action is most needed.


Taking a long-term view on sustainability, particularly decarbonisation, delivers significant benefits, increases company valuation, and supports growth.

Short-term Thinking Has Taken Hold

Shareholder expectations and competitive pressures have always shaped decision-making. But what we now see is a narrowing of focus. Instead of aligning investment with the multi-decade challenge of decarbonisation, many firms prioritise projects with immediate returns, often within a 2–3-year window.


This is dangerous because:


  • The reporting landscape is tightening: Regulations such as the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the UK’s Transition Plan Taskforce (TPT), and International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) alignment are forcing greater transparency. But disclosure is not action.


  • The transition window is closing: Science shows emissions must peak before 2030 and fall nearly half by 2035. Short-term finance cycles are incompatible with this.


  • Competitive positioning is at risk: Companies that delay risk stranded assets, supply chain disruption, and reputational damage as customers and investors demand resilience.

The Retreat from Net Zero: Sentiment vs Reality

Across boardrooms in 2025, enthusiasm for net zero is cooling. Where once CEOs boasted of ambitious targets, now there is widespread retreat.


  • Economic volatility: Inflation, higher interest rates, and supply chain disruption push firms to defer sustainability projects.


  • Investor pressure: Mainstream investors still reward quarterly earnings, not 2040 climate goals.


  • Political cover: With governments slowing ambition, businesses feel less exposed when reducing their own commitments.


This sentiment shift is dangerous. Net zero is not just good PR but a structural transition. Companies stepping back risk missing climate targets and financial benefits.

Why Short-term Planning Fails

  1. Misaligned Investment Horizons: Sustainability requires investments that yield over decades. Projects like renewable infrastructure or efficiency retrofits often need 7–15 years for ROI. 2–3-year payback criteria exclude exactly the projects that build resilience.

  2. Greenwashing Over Governance: Short-term optics - branding, offsets, marginal improvements – are favoured over transformation. Trust erodes among investors, employees, and consumers.

  3. Regulatory Lag Becomes Risk Exposure: Carbon disclosure requirements are accelerating. Businesses unprepared for compliance will face costs, penalties, and reputational harm.

  4. Failure to Secure Financing: Lenders increasingly evaluate transition risk. Firms without credible long-term plans will pay higher financing costs or lose access to capital.

The Case for Long-term Value

Research shows sustainability and profitability are not mutually exclusive:


  • Higher returns: ESG-aligned portfolios have outperformed benchmarks over the past decade.


  • Company valuation: Investment in carbon reduction and efficiency raises asset value and valuation multiples.


  • Resilience: Firms that invested early in renewables benefit from reduced exposure to fossil fuel volatility.


  • Investor sentiment: Global frameworks like the UN COP26 initiated Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) embed climate criteria into long-term capital allocation.


The lesson: businesses that look beyond immediate paybacks are better positioned to attract capital, manage risk, and capture growth opportunities.

How Businesses Must Reframe Sustainability

To break from short-termism, businesses should adopt three principles:


  • Transition Planning as Strategy: Carbon disclosures must be integrated into long-term strategy, aligning investments and risk management around net zero.


  • Evolving Investment Criteria: Payback periods should include avoided carbon costs, resilience, brand equity, and financing conditions – embracing total value, not just financial return.


  • Aligning Incentives: Boards should link executive compensation not only to annual results but to long-term climate and sustainability delivery.


Conclusion: Choosing Lasting Value over Quick Wins

"

A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.”


— Greek Proverb

The world in 2025 is defined by contradiction. The climate crisis accelerates, yet business sentiment retreats into short-term paybacks.


This is unsustainable. Businesses that chase immediate returns risk competitiveness, resilience, and relevance. Those that embrace sustainability as core strategy will unlock profitability, resilience, and trust.


Pushing this problem into the long grass only makes the future more expensive – for businesses, investors, and society alike. The choice is clear: chase short-term gains or invest in lasting value.

Get in Touch

If you are working in a sustainability role or hold a senior role within an organisation and the topic of this insight article resonates with you, please come and talk to us at edenseven. We are a business of practical thinking individuals who have real life experience of working in and running businesses.


We understand the pressures of hitting short-term targets but also the huge benefits a well-structured decarbonisation strategy can have on your business. If you want to talk more, please get in touch using the contact form below.

Contact Form

Contact - Craig Devolution Blog

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Blog Subscribe

SHARE CONTENT

Pembroke College lawn bathed in sunlight
by Tim Passingham 12 March 2026
CAMBRIDGE | See how Cambridge MC and Pembroke College are creating mutual value through a unique corporate partnership spanning student opportunities, academic collaboration and industry events | READ FULL CASE STUDY
Neon sharks made out of code.
by Simon Crimp 9 March 2026
Cyber Security | Ransomware in 2026 is a board-level resilience issue. Learn the key risks, weak spots and practical questions boards should ask to improve readiness, recovery and response.
The Top 21.2026 at the awards event in Cambridge, UK.
6 March 2026
The #21toWatch Top21.2026 winners have been announced at an awards ceremony at The Glasshouse innovation hub in Cambridge.
Asian business woman near a long window and looking at a tablet.
by Arianna Mortali 6 March 2026
BLOG | A student’s perspective on why women shouldn’t have to ‘play masculine’ to succeed at work – and how valuing empathy, confidence and inclusive leadership can help close gender gaps and build healthier organisations.
Abstract squiggle of circles
by Simon Crimp 19 February 2026
Where should leaders start with AI in 2026? A practical guide to moving beyond pilots, clarifying risk appetite, strengthening governance, improving data readiness, and delivering measurable enterprise value from AI at scale | READ FULL ARTICLE
Close up of a data centre stack with ports and wires visible
12 February 2026
We were approached by one of the fastest growing data centre providers in Europe. With over 20 data centres throughout the continent, they are consistently meeting the need for scalable, high-performance infrastructure. Despite this, a key data centre in Scandinavia had become reliant on a single, non-redundant 1 Gbps internet service from a local provider, posing significant risks to operational continuity. To enhance the reliability of its network and resolve these risks, our client needed to establish additional connectivity paths to ensure the redundancy of its infrastructure. The Ask Cambridge Management Consulting was engaged to address these connectivity challenges by identifying and evaluating potential vendors and infrastructure options to create second and third connectivity paths. This involved exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre. Additionally, Cambridge MC was asked to provide recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre to control and maintain diverse paths. This would allow the data centre to connect directly to nearby points of presence (PoPs) and reduce dependency on external providers, thereby enhancing network resilience and operational control. The goal of this project was to ensure that the Nordic data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. Approach & Skills Cambridge MC approached the project with a focus on ensuring operational continuity and resilience for the data centre. By identifying multiple connectivity paths, we aimed to mitigate the risk of network failures and ensure that the data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. This approach allowed Cambridge MC to provide a comprehensive solution to address both immediate and long-term connectivity needs. We employed a combination of Agile and Waterfall methodologies to manage the project. The initial investigative phase allowed a Waterfall approach, in which our team conducted thorough research and analysis to identify potential vendors and connectivity options. This phase involved detailed interviews with various telecommunications providers and an assessment of publicly available information. Once the initial analysis was complete, the workflow transitioned to an Agile approach for the implementation phase. This allowed Cambridge MC to adapt to new information and feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that the final solution was both flexible and robust. Challenges Lack of information: One of the primary obstacles we faced was the lack of detailed network maps and information from some of the potential vendors. To overcome this, the team conducted extensive interviews with contacts at these companies and leveraged its existing network of industry contacts to gather as much information as possible. Remote location: Another challenge was the remote location of the data centre, which limited the availability of local infrastructure and required us to explore creative solutions for connectivity. Cambridge MC addressed this by proposing the construction of a local fibre network around the data centre, which would allow for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby PoPs. Fragmented factors: Additionally, coordinating with multiple vendors and ensuring that their services could be integrated seamlessly posed a logistical challenge. We mitigated this by recommending a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most critical connectivity paths and gradually expanding to include additional options. Outcomes & Results Increased Connectivity: Cambridge MC successfully identified and evaluated multiple connectivity paths for the data centre. By exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre, we provided a comprehensive solution that significantly enhanced network resilience and reliability. Greater Control & Flexibility: Our recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre allowed for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby points of presence, ensuring continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. New Vendors: The team’s extensive network of industry contacts and deep understanding of the regional telecommunications landscape allowed for a thorough and nuanced evaluation of potential vendors and connectivity options. Scope for Future Work: Cambridge MC identified several future developments with the potential to further enhance international connectivity and provide additional redundancy for the data centre. We also proposed further assistance, including a site visit for a more in-depth analysis of options, issuing RFI/RFP to vendors for capacity and fibre, and conducting similar connectivity studies for other candidate sites in the region.
Neon discs fading from blue to green to purple, cascading diagnolly across the screen.
by Cambridge Management Consulting 28 January 2026
Thames Freeport this week revealed the eight companies selected to participate in the Freeport’s Connectivity Lab, an initiative focused on validating commercially proven technologies in live port and logistics environments.
Aerial view of a data centre warehouse in the English countryside
by Duncan Clubb 13 January 2026
Author
by Matt Lawson 2 January 2026
Emerging as a hub for innovation, Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and transform the lives of people in its region. Leveraging global connectivity and occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to drive economic regeneration for the local area. Thames Freeport engaged Cambridge Management Consulting to design a clear strategy for innovation over the next three to five years. Key considerations for this innovation strategy included objectives and KPIs, the future of the business ecosystem in the region, physical clusters and assets such as innovation hubs, and opportunities and challenges on the way. The Solution Working with our innovation partner, L Marks, Cambridge MC conducted an innovation strategy project which involved the following: Engaging with a range of stakeholders and partners from local authorities to corporate partners across the Thames Freeport area, leveraging interviews with key individuals to build a common picture of innovation aspirations, opportunities, and challenges. Conducting a series of workshops for the Thames Freeport team to consider visions and objectives, themes and focus areas, physical hubs and overall programme structure, and a three-year roadmap plan. Building a comprehensive innovation strategy which internalised all of the above questions. This was then presented to their board and formed the basis of the public tenders for innovation programmes that were then made public. 
More posts