The Future of AI in Global Data Centres

Duncan Clubb


Subscribe Contact us

Authors


The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Global Data Centres


In a recent article that breaks down the current trends for global data centres, CBRE, a global commercial real estate services and investment firm, concludes that the market is becoming increasingly tightened by a ‘worldwide shortage of available power’. ‘Large corporations are finding it increasingly difficult to find enough data center capacity’ and, the article warns, ‘Low supply, construction delays and power challenges are impacting all markets’. Subsequently, the impact of these obstacles causes an increase in price. 


As the presence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace rapidly increases, becoming as prolific in our real lives as in the work of science fiction, it will be necessary to expand the capacity of data centres to accommodate this newly burgeoning market. The CBRE articles continues: ‘The rapid growth of artificial intelligence […] is expected to drive continued strong data center demand. This will spur innovations in data center design and technology as operators aim to deliver the capacity that meets the increased power density requirements of high-performance computing.’


In this article, we will break down how this looks in the current digital climate, unpack the impact on data centres globally, and discuss what this means for the immediate future.


Types of AI Systems


As it stands, there are two primary types of AI or Machine Learning (ML) systems that we expect to exert differing, pressures on the data centre market: training engines and inference engines. These equate to different stages of the AI process: in brief, in the training phase, AI systems are fed datasets in order to learn everything required to analyse this data; this will then produce a model which is used within the inference phase to make assessments or predictions which can subsequently be translated into actionable results.


Most forms of training engine require huge amounts of computational power, and hence data centre capacity. In most cases, the physical location of the training engines is not important, so decisions on where to base such systems can be based on cost, frequently placed where electricity and operating costs are the cheapest. 


Inference engines, on the other hand, can be sensitive to distance, especially when they are operating in ‘real-time’ environments which require low network latency. Examples of these are manufacturing systems used to control production lines or industrial process control systems which take inputs from Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as sensors and cameras. These systems can be much smaller than training engines, but also need to be much closer to the action, thus suiting a distributed data centre topology.

AI and Data Centre Capacity


Despite the different requirements by each stage of AI, what is becoming increasingly clear is that the overall data centre capacity needed to host such engines is expected to undergo a huge acceleration in growth. Mark Ganzi, the CEO of DigitalBridge (one of the world’s largest investors in digital infrastructure) is quoted as predicting a near-tripling in the gigawatts (GWs) required: ‘Today, public cloud, which really has been building and leasing space to the data center marketplace over the last 10 years, is about 13GW. Ultimately, to drive AI and to get networks to where we think they will, we believe the opportunity is close to 38GW.’


Given this surge, the preparations made by major data centre colocation organisations are already observable. The Financial Times has estimated that the Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust (Breit) plans to inject $8bn into building new data centres, directly due to the increase in AI workloads. Similarly, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has announced that it will own and operate one of the largest global hyperscale data center platforms in the world. Again, CEO Udhay Mathialagan attributed this decision to the impact of AI: ‘We’re definitely noticing a bit of an uptick with hyperscalers in particular and others looking at applications like AI and seeking to secure supply.’


Hyperscalers, large cloud service providers that provide computing and storage at an enterprise scale, have contributed a significant metric to the accommodations being made for the future of AI. Analysts from TD Cowen have observed that hyperscalers have already begun to pre-lease capacity 2-3 years in advance of facility delivery, an increase from the 12-18-month pre-leasing window witnessed last year. On this discrepancy, they explained: ‘In 2022, leasing prices increased due to the increased cost of building data centers. Now they are higher simply due to limited supply and high demand.’


It is worth noting that most of the growth over the next two years is expected to be in building very large sites for training engines. The wider network of smaller, distributed inference engines is likely to follow at a slightly slower pace. The data centre industry is still debating with itself how and when that will happen.


Key Takeaways


To summarise, in an industry that is already growing rapidly and materialising a great impact on our digital climate, AI stands to cement its position even further by innovating demand for data centre capacity worldwide. With this comes two prescient considerations: how the UK and Europe can capitalise in this expanding market, and how we can all work together to mitigate sustainability risks.

Regarding the former, the most immediate action the UK can take is to emulate the standard currently being set by the US. Adrian Josef, the chief data and AI officer at BT, declared in a parliamentary meeting of the Science and Technology Committee that the global tech industry is in an AI ‘arms race’. Specifically, this so-called ‘race’ pits us against the ‘Big Tech Companies’ of the US and potentially China: ‘There’s a very real risk, that unless we begin to leverage and invest and encourage our startup communities to leverage the great academic institutions that we’ve got to ensure that we have public and private sector all working together […] we in the UK could be left behind.’ At a recent conference, Jaap Zuiderveld of nVidia pointed out that the US is way ahead of the UK and Europe in building out capacity for AI, issuing a wake-up call for the data centre industry.


As countries attempt to stay ahead in this race, it is essential that we, globally, are acknowledging the environmental impact of AI, as well as the societal benefits. AI hardware frequently requires much more power than standard servers, due mostly to their use of Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). This creates a demand for higher energy density, which will necessitate the adoption of innovations such as liquid cooling in order to make energy usage more efficient—a subject we will consider in a future article. 


We can Help with your Data Centre Strategy 


Cambridge Management Consulting is currently working with clients on their AI and data centre strategy. There is momentum building in all sectors which, for most companies, means that there are opportunities that need to be understood and developed. The Cambridge MC team, led by Duncan Clubb, can help in what is a very fast-paced changing technology environment.


Please use the form below to get in touch with Duncan and enquire about our data centre services.

About Cambridge Management Consulting


Cambridge Management Consulting (Cambridge MC) is an international consulting firm that helps companies of all sizes have a better impact on the world. Founded in Cambridge, UK, initially to help the start-up community, Cambridge MC has grown to over 150 consultants working on projects in 20 countries.


Our capabilities focus on supporting the private and public sector with their people, process and digital technology challenges.


For more information visit www.cambridgemc.com or get in touch below.


Contact - Africa

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Blog Subscribe

SHARE CONTENT

Pembroke College lawn bathed in sunlight
by Tim Passingham 12 March 2026
CAMBRIDGE | See how Cambridge MC and Pembroke College are creating mutual value through a unique corporate partnership spanning student opportunities, academic collaboration and industry events | READ FULL CASE STUDY
Neon sharks made out of code.
by Simon Crimp 9 March 2026
Cyber Security | Ransomware in 2026 is a board-level resilience issue. Learn the key risks, weak spots and practical questions boards should ask to improve readiness, recovery and response.
The Top 21.2026 at the awards event in Cambridge, UK.
6 March 2026
The #21toWatch Top21.2026 winners have been announced at an awards ceremony at The Glasshouse innovation hub in Cambridge.
Asian business woman near a long window and looking at a tablet.
by Arianna Mortali 6 March 2026
BLOG | A student’s perspective on why women shouldn’t have to ‘play masculine’ to succeed at work – and how valuing empathy, confidence and inclusive leadership can help close gender gaps and build healthier organisations.
Abstract squiggle of circles
by Simon Crimp 19 February 2026
Where should leaders start with AI in 2026? A practical guide to moving beyond pilots, clarifying risk appetite, strengthening governance, improving data readiness, and delivering measurable enterprise value from AI at scale | READ FULL ARTICLE
Close up of a data centre stack with ports and wires visible
12 February 2026
We were approached by one of the fastest growing data centre providers in Europe. With over 20 data centres throughout the continent, they are consistently meeting the need for scalable, high-performance infrastructure. Despite this, a key data centre in Scandinavia had become reliant on a single, non-redundant 1 Gbps internet service from a local provider, posing significant risks to operational continuity. To enhance the reliability of its network and resolve these risks, our client needed to establish additional connectivity paths to ensure the redundancy of its infrastructure. The Ask Cambridge Management Consulting was engaged to address these connectivity challenges by identifying and evaluating potential vendors and infrastructure options to create second and third connectivity paths. This involved exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre. Additionally, Cambridge MC was asked to provide recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre to control and maintain diverse paths. This would allow the data centre to connect directly to nearby points of presence (PoPs) and reduce dependency on external providers, thereby enhancing network resilience and operational control. The goal of this project was to ensure that the Nordic data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. Approach & Skills Cambridge MC approached the project with a focus on ensuring operational continuity and resilience for the data centre. By identifying multiple connectivity paths, we aimed to mitigate the risk of network failures and ensure that the data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. This approach allowed Cambridge MC to provide a comprehensive solution to address both immediate and long-term connectivity needs. We employed a combination of Agile and Waterfall methodologies to manage the project. The initial investigative phase allowed a Waterfall approach, in which our team conducted thorough research and analysis to identify potential vendors and connectivity options. This phase involved detailed interviews with various telecommunications providers and an assessment of publicly available information. Once the initial analysis was complete, the workflow transitioned to an Agile approach for the implementation phase. This allowed Cambridge MC to adapt to new information and feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that the final solution was both flexible and robust. Challenges Lack of information: One of the primary obstacles we faced was the lack of detailed network maps and information from some of the potential vendors. To overcome this, the team conducted extensive interviews with contacts at these companies and leveraged its existing network of industry contacts to gather as much information as possible. Remote location: Another challenge was the remote location of the data centre, which limited the availability of local infrastructure and required us to explore creative solutions for connectivity. Cambridge MC addressed this by proposing the construction of a local fibre network around the data centre, which would allow for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby PoPs. Fragmented factors: Additionally, coordinating with multiple vendors and ensuring that their services could be integrated seamlessly posed a logistical challenge. We mitigated this by recommending a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most critical connectivity paths and gradually expanding to include additional options. Outcomes & Results Increased Connectivity: Cambridge MC successfully identified and evaluated multiple connectivity paths for the data centre. By exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre, we provided a comprehensive solution that significantly enhanced network resilience and reliability. Greater Control & Flexibility: Our recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre allowed for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby points of presence, ensuring continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. New Vendors: The team’s extensive network of industry contacts and deep understanding of the regional telecommunications landscape allowed for a thorough and nuanced evaluation of potential vendors and connectivity options. Scope for Future Work: Cambridge MC identified several future developments with the potential to further enhance international connectivity and provide additional redundancy for the data centre. We also proposed further assistance, including a site visit for a more in-depth analysis of options, issuing RFI/RFP to vendors for capacity and fibre, and conducting similar connectivity studies for other candidate sites in the region.
Neon discs fading from blue to green to purple, cascading diagnolly across the screen.
by Cambridge Management Consulting 28 January 2026
Thames Freeport this week revealed the eight companies selected to participate in the Freeport’s Connectivity Lab, an initiative focused on validating commercially proven technologies in live port and logistics environments.
Aerial view of a data centre warehouse in the English countryside
by Duncan Clubb 13 January 2026
Author
by Matt Lawson 2 January 2026
Emerging as a hub for innovation, Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and transform the lives of people in its region. Leveraging global connectivity and occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to drive economic regeneration for the local area. Thames Freeport engaged Cambridge Management Consulting to design a clear strategy for innovation over the next three to five years. Key considerations for this innovation strategy included objectives and KPIs, the future of the business ecosystem in the region, physical clusters and assets such as innovation hubs, and opportunities and challenges on the way. The Solution Working with our innovation partner, L Marks, Cambridge MC conducted an innovation strategy project which involved the following: Engaging with a range of stakeholders and partners from local authorities to corporate partners across the Thames Freeport area, leveraging interviews with key individuals to build a common picture of innovation aspirations, opportunities, and challenges. Conducting a series of workshops for the Thames Freeport team to consider visions and objectives, themes and focus areas, physical hubs and overall programme structure, and a three-year roadmap plan. Building a comprehensive innovation strategy which internalised all of the above questions. This was then presented to their board and formed the basis of the public tenders for innovation programmes that were then made public. 
More posts