Technology

Digital Transformation


Transforming your digital ambitions into a reality

Establish Skills & Frameworks to Thrive in a Digital-First Era


Realise the Full Potential
of your Vision

Implement digital transformation in incremental stages that also build resilience


Despite pressure from customer expectations and competition from disruptive start-ups, many companies have struggled to manage successive cycles of digital transformation as they attempt to innovate and scale their architectures and services. 


To realise a return on your technology investment, your strategy, budget control, project management and change management must be meticulously planned, have full support and work in tandem with each other.


How we help our clients

Our team of experts has decades of experience providing Digital Transformation services to both private and public companies

Test Strategy & Automation

Enhances your digital transition by implementing  a framework for systematic software testing processes and integrating automation tools to increase efficiency and reliability.

Digital Transformation as a Service

A flexible and cost-efficient model that supports incremental phases of digital transformation such as cloud computing, data analytics, and user experience improvements.

Microsoft

Our expertise in implementation, customisation, and managed services ensures optimised deployment of Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, and Azure, enhancing collaboration, security, and data analytics.

Digital Delivery / DevSecOps

We help you create a culture and environment where building, testing, and releasing new products & services can occur rapidly, frequently, and more securely.

Digital Transformation Implementation

We assess workforce resilience and change readiness, paving the way for incremental project stages. This includes the adoption of digital tools, process re-engineering, and change management.

Requirements Management

We ensure clarity and alignment throughout your digital transformation by effectively capturing and prioritising requirements. This helps to minimise risks, enhance collaboration, and streamline project execution.

UX/CX Design Assurance

We use data and AI to elevate user experiences and customer journeys through rigorous testing and validation. Our unique blend of data-driven insights and creative design ensures that every interaction is intuitive, engaging and positive.

Speak to one of our experts

Additional Services


33%


Adoption of GenAI worldwide by businesses

1300%


The average ROI of enterprises using business data & analytics

90%


Of organisations worldwide have implemented cloud technologies

3.5x


Companies with a culture of innovation are 3.5 times more likely to outperform their peers

Innovation Case Study
Delivery of Global EV Charging Hubs


A multinational client wanted to invest into network infrastructure (WAN, LAN, WLAN) to provide EV charger connectivity with a PCI compliant payment solution, in order to deliver a reliable and secure service and the best customer experience possible across a portfolio of global sites. 


The goal was to provide the same experience and services on all EV charging sites that carry the client’s logo while not being directly in charge of making decisions as to which locations will be equipped with EV chargers.


This EV charging programme delivery needs to be closely aligned with other network upgrade programmes running simultaneously on all customer owned/operated sites in multiple countries. 


The client approached us to support the development and implementation of a ‘cookie-cutter’ network connectivity solution that would be accepted and implemented in cooperation with their teams responsible for the deployment.

READ CASE STUDY

"Cambridge MC helped the University of Bristol complete a multi-million modern network design & procurement, ensuring that University of Bristol remains the university of choice for student, academics and partners in a globally competitive market."


—University of Bristol Case Study


David Lewis against a blurred office background

Our Digital Transformation service is led by David Lewis

Managing Partner - Digital & Innovation

David’s directorial roles have included positions at Trapezo, Sony Music, and the co-founding of One5 Corporation in Romania. After selling One5, David held key positions at M9Global Limited, Tech Mahindra, and Infosys, where he led the largest online transformation in the telecommunications industry for Europe.


In 2012, David became the Practice Head of an Advanced Solutions Group for Cognizant, shaping the company’s first digital transformation group with global influence. In 2017, he joined the UK Cabinet Office as the Director of Delivery and Support and adviser to the Director General of Government Digital Service, before establishing the Chief Digital and Information Officer function in 2019. During this time, he independently reviewed government technology projects.


Since leaving the Cabinet Office, David has contributed to organisations such as the New Lottery Company, Capita, and BetterGov. Additionally, he serves as a Non-Executive Director for SSV Capital Ltd, and is a dedicated Trustee for the Carers Network, in line with his commitment to giving back to society.

Our team can be your team


Our team of experts have multiple decades of experience across many different business environments and across various geographies.


We can build you a specialised team with the skillset and expertise required to meet the demands of your industry.


Our combination of expertise and an intelligent methodology is what realises tangible financial benefits for clients.

Our Digital Transformation Experts

Get in touch with our Consultants today


We are a highly collaborative team of senior-level executive professionals able to adapt to any challenge, however niche & challenging.

+44 (0)1223 750335

info@cambridgemc.com

Contact Form - Digital Transformation

Case Studies


Our team has had the privilege of partnering with a diverse array of clients, from burgeoning startups to FTSE 100 companies. Each case study reflects our commitment to delivering tailored solutions that drive real business results.

CASE STUDIES

A little bit about Cambridge MC


Cambridge Management Consulting is a specialist consultancy drawing on an extensive global network of talent. We are your growth catalyst.


Our purpose is to help our clients make a better impact on the world.

ABOUT CAMBRIDGE MC

“90% of CEOs believe the digital economy will impact their industry, but less than 15% are executing on a digital strategy.”


MIT Sloan and Capgemini

"less than 15% are executing on a digital strategy"

Digital Transformation insights


Murky gloom under the sea with light rays piercing from above
by Andy Everest 28 May 2025
Introduction In today's interconnected world, submarine cable networks form the backbone of global communication, enabling the seamless exchange of data across continents. While these undersea cables are the epitome of engineering marvels, their effectiveness hinges not only on the ‘wet' network in the seabed, but also on the often-overlooked terrestrial network backhaul. The terrestrial backhaul — the infrastructure that connects submarine cable landing stations to inland data centres and networks — is as crucial as the submarine network itself. Proper management and handling of terrestrial backhaul partners is essential to ensure the optimal performance, cost-efficiency, and security of all submarine networks. The Vital Importance of Backhaul Management Submarine networks are only as strong as their weakest link, and the terrestrial backhaul is a pivotal link in this ecosystem. Without a well-designed and managed backhaul, even the most sophisticated submarine network can face inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and vulnerabilities.  Key reasons why managing terrestrial network backhaul partners is so critical include: Cost Optimisation Terrestrial backhaul costs constitute a significant portion of the total network expenditure. Poorly negotiated contracts or suboptimal supplier relationships can inflate operational costs, diminishing the overall profitability of submarine networks. Network Performance The design, quality, and reliability of terrestrial backhaul networks directly affect latency, throughput, and overall user experience. A poorly managed partner ecosystem can lead to performance degradation, affecting service delivery. Security and Risk Mitigation The terrestrial segment is often more vulnerable to physical and cyber threats compared to submarine cables. Effective partner management ensures that security measures are prioritised, and risks are mitigated. Scalability and Flexibility As data demands grow, submarine networks must scale effectively. Well-managed terrestrial backhaul partners enable seamless scaling and adaptability to meet changing requirements.
A line of floor to ceiling shelves in a warehouse
by Andy Everest 21 May 2025
Procurement, like many other sectors, is currently being transformed by AI technologies. Organisations are rapidly adopting AI solutions to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and gain a competitive advantage in their procurement processes. According to recent research by Economist Impact, AI tools are already helping procurement professionals at 64% of firms, with larger organisations leading this digital transformation [7]. However, given the challenges of effectively implementing AI tools and their tendency to produce inaccurate or misleading outputs, it is essential for organisations to critically assess the immediate value of this technology, the costs involved in its deployment, and the potential impact on procurement teams. This article explores the user cases of AI in procurement, the emergence of Agentic AI, implementation challenges and strategies, and how Cambridge Management Consulting can guide you through this complex process and over the hurdles. We also stress that AI in procurement is not a panacea — it can be leveraged successfully for certain user cases when it is integrated with the support of well-trained teams who can spot errors and who understand the limits of these tools. Let's Start with the Limits AI, despite the marketing hype in the media, is not yet a ‘silver bullet’ or an all-encompassing fix when it comes to procurement. It will not solve everything on day one, but it will change how a procurement function operates and will no doubt drive efficiency alongside data accuracy and linkage. Now, more than ever, having a skilled Procurement team alongside cutting-edge technologies like AI is essential for unlocking new efficiencies and elevating procurement to the next level. AI will make a procurement team even more data driven in their analysis and decision making. AI tools will allow procurement teams to sift through vast amounts of data quickly and will draw conclusions for review and assessment. The power of being data driven should not be underestimated and as the American composer and economist W. Edwards Deming once said, “Without data, you’re just another person with an opinion, […] in God we trust; all others bring data” [22]. Each and every organisation must carefully consider how to leverage AI-generated data effectively. While AI can enhance procurement processes, an experienced procurement team remains essential for defining and prioritising key challenges, navigating contract negotiations, and implementing structured cost-reduction strategies. The human touch — particularly in managing and driving commercial supplier relationships — will continue to be a vital component of procurement. While relationship management may not be the single most important aspect of supplier management, it is undeniably critical. It encompasses relationship-building, communication, collaboration, and trust: elements that are fundamental to maximising supplier value and mitigating risks. Supplier management is more than just overseeing transactions; it demands a proactive approach that fosters strong partnerships. AI can revolutionise data management, but it must be complemented by the human expertise that ensures strategic decision-making, relationship stewardship, and long-term supplier success. One could argue that it is easy to get lost in an AI discussion or defining a procurement strategy, but bottom-line supplier relationship management is critical and integral for any procurement department to be successful. If you cannot build, leverage and maintain relationships, you shouldn’t be at the table. The Current State of AI in Procurement Generative AI (GenAI) is having the same disruptive effect in procurement that it is in many other business areas, initially by completing quite simple tasks with incredible speed, accuracy and efficiency. This includes automating routine tasks, providing actionable insights from data sets, and freeing up time for your teams to focus on higher-level tasks such as managing processes and vendor relationships. Below we highlight which tasks can be successfully enhanced or supported by AI. AI-Powered Procurement Automation For business leaders, AI is the tireless digital assistant that procurement teams have long needed. By automating tedious tasks like purchase order processing, linking third-party costs back to revenue services to strive for gross margin clarity, invoice management, and contract administration, AI frees professionals to focus on strategic initiatives. The impact is substantial: according to recent data, 45% of AI investments in procurement are focused on contract automation, highlighting organisational priorities for efficiency improvement and error reduction [1]. Real-world implementation has shown significant results. For example, a global manufacturing company deployed AI to automate invoice processing, reducing errors by 80% and cutting processing time by half [1]. Data-Driven Decision-Making AI spares procurement from wading through hours of paperwork, a process that is time-consuming and prone to cascades of errors. Rather than being overwhelmed by huge data sets and unsure on which useful information to extract, AI does this with much more precision and many orders of speed. With AI-driven analytics, procurement teams can manage and link multiple data sets, identify trends, and make more informed purchasing decisions in real time. McKinsey reports that procurement leaders implementing AI-driven analytics have accelerated supplier selection by 30%, demonstrating the significant impact on workflow efficiency [1]. The Rise of Agentic AI in Procurement While traditional AI has already made significant inroads in procurement, a more advanced form — Agentic AI — is now emerging as a step-change for the profession. What is Agentic AI? Agentic AI represents the next phase in artificial intelligence models. Unlike previous automation tools that require human oversight for key decisions, AI agents can operate independently, leveraging machine learning, predictive analytics, and natural language processing to interact with suppliers, assess risks, and optimise sourcing strategies with minimal supervision[4]. According to The Hackett Group's 2025 Procurement Agenda and Key Issues Study, Agentic AI is the top trend impacting procurement this year, alongside digital procurement and automation[4]. The technology is expected to disrupt nearly 50% of procurement activities over the next five to seven years, creating entirely new opportunities for strategy[4]. The outlook for procurement teams might be more climatic, depending on the consistency and accuracy of Agentic AI. These models will be capable of independent reasoning and it currently unclear how close this will bring us to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Adoption Trends and Strategic Focus The shift in Agentic AI from concept to a reality might be surprisingly rapid. A recent survey by ProcureCon found that 90% of procurement leaders are considering AI agents for optimising their procurement functions[4]. This technology is becoming central to orchestrating complex procurement activities with unprecedented efficiency — from sourcing and contract negotiations to spend classification, supplier onboarding, compliance, and risk assessment. There is relatively little data or evidence at this point to suggest the likely error-rate among these agents and to what degree all results and actions will need to be checked and validated by human teams. It is also underappreciated that in order to successfully implement AI, businesses must have set up basic data structures, metadata, and processes. A significant number of companies are not yet ready to adopt these technologies and must get their house in order first. Implementation is a potentially complex and expensive task, requiring long phases of design and testing to fine-tune the outputs. Benefits of AI Procurement The adoption of AI in procurement delivers multiple advantages that will enhance organisational performance across various metrics. We look at the key advantages below: Cost Reduction & Efficiency Gains AI implementation in procurement delivers measurable financial benefits. McKinsey highlights a 10% reduction in procurement costs through AI adoption[1]. By automating routine tasks, businesses reduce labour costs while simultaneously increasing throughput and accuracy. Enhanced Supplier Management AI transforms supplier relationships by providing deeper insights into supplier performance, risk profiles, and market dynamics. This enables procurement teams to make more informed decisions about supplier selection, negotiation strategies, and relationship management. Agentic AI will bring predictive analytics that will be able to flag and correct issues in your supply chain before they occur. Improved Risk Management Leading AI platforms apply advanced machine learning techniques to uncover signals in supplier data that indicate potential disruptions, from financial issues and bankruptcy risks to geopolitical challenges, climate events, and cyber threats. This allows procurement teams to mitigate risks proactively rather than reactively, creating a significantly lower threat to spend, compliance and reputational damage[6]. Contract Intelligence Natural language processing tools extract insights from legacy contracts and external databases to benchmark terms. AI can negotiate agreements with suppliers in real-time chat sessions, optimise renewals, and highlight risks — significantly reducing the manual burden on procurement teams. Smart contracts can then self-execute when conditions are met and provide comprehensive audit trails[6]. See our separate article on AI in Contract Management for more details: https://www.cambridgemc.com/how-to-successfully-integrate-ai-into-your-contract-lifecycle-management Challenges in Implementing AI in Procurement Despite the clear benefits, companies face several significant challenges when implementing AI in their procurement functions. Data Quality & Availability AI systems require vast amounts of accurate data to function effectively. Many supply chains struggle with data silos and inconsistent formats, making it difficult to create the comprehensive, high-quality datasets needed for AI[2]. Data fragmentation across different systems — legacy platforms, ERP systems, sensors, and IoT devices — creates integration challenges that can undermine the effectiveness of AI [8]. Integration with Existing Systems Many legacy procurement systems were not designed to integrate with modern AI technologies, leading to compatibility issues and potential disruptions in system functionality [2]. This technical challenge often requires significant IT resources to overcome. Implementation Costs Implementing AI involves substantial initial expenses for software, hardware, and skilled personnel. Additionally, there are ongoing costs to retrain AI models as business environments evolve [2]. These financial considerations can be barriers to adoption, particularly for smaller organisations. Internal Resistance Resistance to adopting new technologies often stems from a lack of understanding, fear of job displacement, or discomfort with changing established workflows[2]. This human factor can significantly slow or derail AI implementation efforts if not properly addressed with training, careful messaging and change management methodologies. Data Security Concerns As AI systems process sensitive procurement data, including confidential pricing information and intellectual property, security becomes a critical concern. Businesses must engage comprehensive data protection measures while still enabling AI systems to access the information they need. Responsible AI As well as data security concerns, there is also a strong need and argument for companies to strive for fitness and non-discrimination when it comes to AI. Companies should have an AI Risk and Assessment process in place to ensure that data bias is avoided and that ethical guidelines when it comes to data analysis and management are followed. The ‘AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory (AEGGI)’, created by Algorithm Watch, currently contains 167 sets of principles and guidelines, which it recommends should be followed, and there are also responsible AI training tools available, such as Google’s ‘People & AI Guidebook’ and Omidyar Networks ‘Ethical Explorer’, that can be used. Additionally, new legislation is also being introduced, for example, the ‘EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act’, to ensure that AI is used responsibly. It’s widely acknowledged that 8 core principles should be assessed and evaluated when developing AI accountability [20]: Privacy & Security Reliability & Safety Transparency & Explainability Fairness & Non-discrimination Professional Responsibility Human Control Promotion of Human Values Strategies for Successful AI Implementation To overcome implementation challenges and maximise the benefits of AI in procurement, you should consider the following strategies: Establish Strong Data Foundations Before diving into AI adoption, you must ensure that your business has the right data infrastructure in place. This includes: Improving data quality, governance, and standardisation Integrating disparate data sources Establishing real-time data capabilities, which are prerequisites for effective AI implementation[4] Implementing foundational tools like spend analysis and decision optimisation[1] Take a Targeted Approach Rather than attempting wholesale transformation, you should: Identify specific areas where AI can complement existing processes Focus initial implementation on high-value, low-complexity use cases Use AI where it adds the most value rather than applying it universally [1] Consider a phased implementation approach Address the Human Element Successful AI implementation requires careful attention to the people involved: Equip your workforce with the skills to leverage AI effectively Implement comprehensive change management strategies Educate employees about how AI will enhance their roles rather than replace them Rethink how procurement teams interact with AI-driven systems [4] Balance AI with Human Intelligence The most effective procurement functions will be those that: Combine the efficiency of AI with human judgment and expertise Preserve crucial human skills in negotiation, relationship management, and strategic decision-making Use AI to augment human capabilities rather than replace them entirely [1] Create collaborative human-AI workflows that maximise the strengths of both approaches Conclusion: Blending AI & Human Expertise AI is fundamentally reshaping procurement, transforming it from a primarily transactional function to a strategic and predictive driver of value. From automating routine tasks to enabling sophisticated predictive analytics and autonomous decision-making, AI technologies are creating unprecedented opportunities for efficiency, intelligence, and innovation. While implementation challenges exist, businesses that approach AI adoption strategically, with proper attention to data foundations, targeted use cases, and human factors, can realise significant benefits. As we look into the near future, the most successful procurement functions will be those that effectively blend AI capabilities with human expertise, creating a powerful synergy that drives an ongoing competitive advantage. Cambridge MC: Your Partner for AI-Powered Procurement Implementing AI in procurement requires specialised expertise and experience. Cambridge Management Consulting (Cambridge MC) offers you the guidance needed to navigate this complex transformation successfully. We have dedicated Data and AI teams as well as a deep background in procurement and contract management expertise. Comprehensive Implementation Support Cambridge MC offers: Strategic assessment of procurement AI opportunities Roadmap development for AI implementation Integration of AI solutions with existing procurement systems Change management support to ensure successful adoption Ongoing optimisation of AI-powered procurement processes Get in touch with Andy Everest or one of our procurement experts to discuss your current needs and any issues pertaining to AI and procurement. Use the form below or email: aeverest@cambridgemc.com . Visit our Commercial & Procurement page: https://www.cambridgemc.com/procurement-and-commercial Citations [1] https://consultingquest.com/insights/generative-ai-in-procurement/ [2] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/6-key-challenges-ai-implementation-supply-chain-industry-chris-clowes-1r67c [3] https://www.oracle.com/scm/ai-in-procurement/ [4] https://www.gep.com/blog/technology/agentic-in-procurement-overview-benefits-implementation [5] https://futuria.ai/futuria-and-cambridge-management-consulting-announce-innovative-ai-driven-partnership/ [6] https://www.gep.com/blog/technology/how-ai-is-revolutionizing-the-procurement-cycle [7] https://impact.economist.com/perspectives/strategy-leadership/ai-demands-new-era-procurement-skills [8] https://www.qservicesit.com/9-common-challenges-in-supply-chain-management-with-ai [9] https://precoro.com/blog/ai-in-procurement/ [10] https://www.cio.com/article/3853910/how-agentic-ai-can-deliver-profound-transformation-in-procurement.html [11] https://www.cambridgemc.com/futuria-and-cambridge-management-consulting-announce-innovative-ai-driven-partnership [12] https://www.spendflo.com/blog/ai-in-procurement-orchestration [13] https://media-publications.bcg.com/BCG-Executive-Perspectives-Future-of-Procurement-with-AI-2025-27Feb2025.pdf [14] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11788849/ [15] https://www.cappo.org/news/660146/Pros-and-Cons-of-Using-Artificial-Intelligence-for-Procurement.htm [16] https://pactum.com/understanding-agentic-ai-in-procurement-how-autonomous-ai-has-been-transforming-supplier-deals/ [17] https://digitalisationworld.com/news/67692/qarbon-technologies-collaborates-with-cambridge-management-consulting [18] https://www.coupa.com/blog/ai-in-procurement/ [19] https://suplari.com/10-procurement-job-roles-most-impacted-by-ai/ [20] https://stockiqtech.com/blog/disadvantages-ai-supply-chain/ [21] ‘ Responsible AI: Principles and Practical Applications ’ – LinkedIn Course, By: Tsu-Jae Liu, Brandie Nonnecke , and Jill Finlayson ( https://www.linkedin.com/learning-login/share?forceAccount=false&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Flearning%2Fai-accountability-build-responsible-and-transparent-systems%3Ftrk%3Dshare_ent_url%26shareId%3DhTdANzytTi28DI30mdTN%252BQ%253D%253D ) [22] Top 200 W. Edwards Deming Quotes (2025 Update). QuoteFancy . https://quotefancy.com/w-edwards-deming-quotes.
An artistic representation of fin LEO satellites lined up in space
by Mauro Mortali 16 April 2025
"Is it Snowing in Space?!" “Is it snowing in space?!” Asks a disgruntled Bill Murray in the film Groundhog Day when he is told that he cannot call out from the snowbound town of Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. If there is a remake, Bill might not have to worry: signal dead zones may soon be a thing of the past due to recent advancements in satellite technology. Whereas the old picture of satellite communications was a scientist in the wilderness with a big clunky antenna, these days the technological payload is all in space. Recent advancements such as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, advanced beamforming, and the use of mobile spectrum bands means that any phone supporting 4G LTE can potentially receive satellite data directly. This integration of satellite and terrestrial networks is set to reshape the mobile industry, creating both opportunities and challenges for traditional mobile network operators (MNOs) and mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs). In this article we give an overview of the technological advancements, the major players in the market, and then consider the effects this will have on traditional wholesale mobile market structures; concluding with the emerging opportunities for new revenue and growth. The Evolution of Satellite Connectivity Historically, satellite communications operated independently from terrestrial networks, serving specialised markets with limited scalability and high entry barriers. However, recent advancements, particularly in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite technology, have dramatically altered this scenario. The most well-known example is obviously SpaceX, which has played a pivotal role in democratising space: reducing barriers to entry and making satellite connectivity more scalable, performant, and accessible. SpaceX and other companies have found innovative ways to dramatically reduce costs. Since Sputnik 1 in 1957, launching payloads into space has been prohibitively expensive, with costs exceeding $100,000 per kilogram in the 1960s and averaging $16,000/kg for heavy payloads from 1970 to 2010. SpaceX’s innovations have brought these costs down through reusable rockets, vertical integration, economies of scale, and advancements in materials and manufacturing processes: leading to price points as low as $100 per kilogram in recent years. However, cost is just one of the barriers. The real gambit has been provided by Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, which typically orbit at altitudes ranging from approximately 160 to 2,000 km and offer low-latency, high-speed connectivity — making them ideal for real-time applications and direct-to-device communications. The latest generation of technologies now enable LTE mobile phones to connect directly to satellites without specialised hardware, marking a significant milestone in mobile communications. The Major Satellite-to-Cell Players While SpaceX's Starlink has garnered the most attention, several other major companies are actively developing satellite-to-cell technologies and forming strategic partnerships with terrestrial mobile operators. As of April 2024, Starlink had established 15 partnerships with mobile carriers globally — including T-Mobile in the US. T-Mobile has structured its beta program to begin with text messaging capabilities, gradually expanding to include picture messages, data connectivity, and eventually voice calls. As of February 2025, it is reported that 7,086 Starlink satellites are in orbit, with 7,052 being operational. AST SpaceMobile has emerged as a significant innovator, achieving a historic milestone in April 2023 with the first-ever two-way voice call directly with an unmodified smartphone, via their BlueWalker 3 satellite. AST SpaceMobile launched its first five commercial satellites, the BlueBird 1-5 mission, on September 12, 2024, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. Lynk Global represents another significant player. In a recent expense report, it revealed that each satellite costs around $400,000 to build and up to $815,000 to launch into space. They hope to have up to 1000 satellites (for full continuous broadband coverage) in orbit by 2025 and 32 mobile network operator (MNO) partnerships by the end of 2025. The company has successfully demonstrated text messaging capabilities from satellites to standard cellular devices and continues to expand its constellation and service offerings. Huawei has partnered with China Telecom to demonstrate satellite-to-phone messaging capabilities, while Apple has worked with Globalstar to implement emergency satellite messaging features in recent iPhone models. Implications for Traditional Wholesale Mobile Market Structures Traditionally, the wholesale mobile market has been structured around MNOs, MVNOs, and wholesale aggregators. Revenue streams have typically included MVNO wholesale pricing, and IoT and machine-to-machine (M2M) solutions. However, the rise of satellite-to-cell technology poses potential threats to this established model. Disintermediation of MNOs and MVNOs Satellite-to-cell connectivity introduces the potential for disintermediation, where control traditionally held by MNOs could become fragmented across multiple parties in the value chain. As satellite providers increasingly offer direct-to-device services, traditional operators risk losing their central role in network management and customer relationships. Pricing Pressure on Wholesale Markets The increased availability and competition from satellite connectivity providers could exert downward pressure on wholesale pricing. As satellite services become more affordable and accessible, traditional wholesale providers may face challenges in maintaining their pricing structures and profitability. Competitive Pressure in IoT and Enterprise Applications Satellite connectivity is particularly well-suited for IoT and enterprise applications, especially in remote or challenging environments. As satellite-to-cell technology matures, traditional wholesale providers may face intensified competition in these segments, necessitating strategic adjustments to remain competitive. Emerging Opportunities in Satellite-to-Cell Connectivity Despite these challenges, the integration of satellite connectivity into mobile networks also presents substantial opportunities for innovation and growth. Forward-thinking operators can leverage satellite-to-cell technology to develop new business models and revenue streams. Hybrid Terrestrial-Satellite Subscription Models Providing Ubiquitous Connectivity Operators can offer hybrid subscription plans that seamlessly integrate terrestrial and satellite connectivity. Such models provide customers with uninterrupted coverage, enhancing user experience and creating differentiated service offerings. Wholesale Satellite Resale for MVNOs Satellite-to-cell technology opens new avenues for MVNOs to expand their service portfolios. By reselling satellite connectivity, MVNOs can offer enhanced coverage and reliability, particularly in underserved or remote regions, thereby attracting new customer segments. IoT and Enterprise-Focused Applications Satellite connectivity is a natural fit for IoT and enterprise applications, such as remote monitoring, asset tracking, and industrial automation. Mobile operators can forge strategic partnerships with satellite providers to deliver specialised solutions for these markets, tapping into new revenue opportunities. Emergency-Only and Disaster Recovery Plans Satellite-to-cell technology can play a crucial role in emergency and disaster recovery scenarios, providing a reliable backup to terrestrial networks when they are unavailable or overwhelmed. Operators can develop emergency-only plans that leverage satellite connectivity to ensure critical communications during crises. Conclusion Satellite-to-cell technology represents a convergence of space and terrestrial communications systems that promises to fundamentally alter global connectivity markets and players. The dramatic reduction in launch costs by a factor of 20 has enabled the deployment of massive satellite constellations that were previously economically unfeasible. The competitive landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with SpaceX, AST SpaceMobile, and Lynk, and traditional telecommunications companies all pursuing various technological approaches and business models. Commercial text messaging services are already becoming available through beta programs, with video calling capabilities demonstrated and voice calls progressing toward wider availability. The integration of 5G standards with satellite networks continues to advance through collaborative industry initiatives, with projections of a $50 billion market by 2032. As this technology continues to mature throughout 2025 and beyond, it promises to eliminate mobile dead zones and create new application possibilities that were previously unimaginable. The future of mobile communications is undoubtably hybrid: blending terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks into seamless connectivity solutions that follow users wherever they go. This has wide reaching implications for connectivity in remote and isolated regions, and offers perhaps the fastest and most cost-efficient route to bridging the digital divide. It will also transform how we respond in disaster zones and hazardous areas — increasing the ability to protect and save lives with faster and safer humanitarian and emergency services.
Silhouette of 737 plane in a neon sky
by Tom Burton 9 April 2025
What Problem do Too Many SaaS Providers Have in Common? Many SaaS security providers have a history of treating important safety and security features as something to upsell. This raises the important question of whether a software vendor has a moral responsibility for the secure operation of their solution. In this article, we explore the implications of treating important security and safety features as an upsell, using Boeing as a test case of where this can go wrong. The Case of Boeing and the Aviation Industry The case against Boeing is emblematic of a more systemic issue across the aviation industry, and many other industries. The public became aware of this issue under tragic circumstances when the Lion Air and Ethiopian Air Boeing 737 Max airliners crashed in 2018 and 2019 respectively. According to the widely quoted New York Times article , the crash could have been avoided if the pilots had access to two safety features that were sold by Boeing as optional extras. According to the incident reports, at the root of the incident were the angle-of-attack sensors. These mechanical sensors operate in a similar fashion to a weathervane to measure whether the aircraft’s nose is pointing above or below the direction of airflow. Being mechanical, they may be prone to malfunction, perhaps jamming after having been installed incorrectly — as was believed to be the case for the Lion Air aircraft . The system that led to the aircraft’s demise, which identifies the risk of the aircraft stalling, only listened to one of the sensors. A difference in the signal being sent by the two sensors was not recognised by the anti-stall system; and the instruments that would have alerted the pilots to the conflicting signals were upsell items. This wasn’t a fancy, nice-to-have bell or whistle that makes the flight more comfortable, efficient, or profitable. It is an underlying safety feature of the aircraft. If there was no safety requirement for the redundancy of two sensors, it is difficult to see why there would ever be more than one. Boeing has now addressed the issue, and the anti-stall system listens to both sensors, responding safely in the event of conflicting signals. It should also be noted that the investigation identified pilot error and deficiencies in the training that contributed to the disasters (and this will be relevant to our points regarding many SaaS product decisions as well). The SaaS Parallels Cloud-delivered Software as a Service (SaaS) has revolutionised the tech industry, and catalysed a phenomenal level of innovation and growth. It has enabled new software capabilities to be brought to market faster than ever before, and facilitated the ability to reach a scale with costs defrayed across multiple customers that would have been unimaginable 30 years ago. However, the benefits of being able to access a service from anywhere, at any time, by anyone also presents significant risks. The ‘anyone’ can be a malicious party operating outside of the reach of law enforcement or extradition. As a result, there are clear commercial responsibilities placed on SaaS providers to secure their infrastructure from attack, and those that do not are unlikely to last long in the marketplace. But just like the aviation industry, there are different flavours of security, and different perceptions of what is considered essential. Taking due care and applying due diligence to ensure that the platform itself is adequately secured from a direct attack is clearly the vendor’s responsibility – but what about those elements of security that relate to risk owned by their customers? One key element of customer risk relates to the security of a user’s password. It is their responsibility to make sure they choose a long and random string drawn from upper case, lower case, numerical, and special characters (if allowed). It is also their responsibility to ensure that they do not ever use the same password for multiple applications or services. But, we know that compromised credentials is a common failure mode. Just because it is the user’s responsibility to mitigate this risk, this doesn’t mean that system developers do not also have some mutual responsibility to make it easier for the user to exercise that responsibility; controls have been developed specifically for that purpose. The most obvious ones are Multi Factor Authentication (MFA, or 2FA), and Single Sign On (SSO). With MFA, we improve the security of the credentials by also verifying that the user is in possession of their trusted device before we trust them at sign in. With SSO, we minimise the number of credentials and accounts to manage by federating with a single corporate account; we can then concentrate our effort to secure that corporate account rather than spreading our resources thinly. Both are relatively easily implemented these days, particularly in the case of SSO where the OAuth protocols are widely offered by Identity Providers. Once implemented, both are essentially free to operate, particularly if MFA uses an Authenticator app rather than SMS text messages. SaaS providers recognise that this security is important, and they will frequently implement MFA and SSO controls into their applications to meet that customer demand. But, too frequently, we see them only offered as part of the more expensive subscription options. This element of security is not enhancing the vendor’s core proposition; it is not making their offering more functional, better looking, or more efficient for their users. It is just making it more secure, and therefore to treat it as an item to upsell comes across as price-gouging rather than the responsible application of good security practice. It is almost as though these vendors have run out of innovative bells and whistles that their clients would value in their core product, so they have had to resort to undermining the security of their cheaper options in order to encourage their customers to pay for their more expensive ones. It is equivalent to a bank only using the CSC code on a card to secure transactions for customers who pay for their premium banking services, because, after all, it is the customer’s responsibility to protect their card details. Conclusion What we have described here is not universal, and probably is not even representative of the majority of SaaS providers. But, when you are reviewing a new service, we urge you to take a closer look at what security your provider is charging extra for. If low cost, high value security controls are being upsold, then you may want to consider what other security good practices are not being considered essential. For more information about our cyber security consulting services and Secure by Design principles in action, please contact Tom Burton, Partner for Cyber Security, using the form below.
SEE MORE INSIGHTS