Mergers and Acquisitions: What to Know before Starting a TSA

Jeff Owen


Subscribe Contact us

Authors


Part 1 in a 6-part Series on Transition Service Agreements and Divestitures

Mergers and Acquisitions after Covid-19: Where Are We Now?


It is undeniable that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a major influence on the business sector; between disruptions in the supply chain, economic troughs, and a lingering switch to hybrid working, no organisation has been untouched by its impact. 


The field of Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) is no different: though 2021 saw more than $5 trillion in global volume, marking a record year for M&A and a more-than impressive rebound from the pandemic, 2022 did not achieve the same capacity for growth. Though the year started well, it was met with a quick plateau and ended up falling short of its prior benchmark due to a number of factors, including stock market volatility, soaring inflation, supply chain issues, and increased borrowing costs.


As a consequence, there has been a growing trend of divestitures and carve-outs caused by the resulting economic pressures. Companies are more-often opting to realign and consolidate their priorities and concentrate on core business units and areas of profitability. 


This flatline is not completely pessimistic, however. Though an economic downturn such as this does create many challenges and higher risks, there is also plenty of room for exciting opportunities. For example, the risks involved give both buyers and sellers a reason to invest in thorough due diligence. In the case of divestitures, this includes a robust Transition Service Agreement (TSA) that supports a realistic transition period and a clear deadline for exit.


This article comprises one of six posts designed to provide and outline guidance for constructing and achieving a holistic TSA for your organisation.

One of the biggest mistakes companies make in divestitures is not having a watertight TSA.

- Jeff Owen, Managing Partner for M&A

What Are the Advantages of a TSA?

A British Exploring Society expedition in Iceland

A TSA is a legally binding document that sets out the terms for a seller to continue running or supporting a purchased business unit during a transition phase. It then governs this transition period from financial close to separation, a period which can vary but often lasts for around six months (although up to a year is not uncommon).


The transition phase gives the buyer time to align and integrate the new business unit with their operations, including resolution of staffing and resourcing issues.


The main benefit of a TSA is its speed, accelerating the negotiation process without waiting for a buyer to assume full responsibility for the chosen business unit. This assures a quick resolution and efficient financial close during the transition.


While there may be some costs associated with implementing a TSA, the benefits usually far outweigh these costs in the long run.

TSAs Must also Be Managed Effectively

Although TSAs are the most efficient and rounded way of resolving a divestiture, they are not without their challenges. It is useful to understand these complexities and manage them with foresight to prevent delays and overspend.


It is useful to split these challenges into those affecting the seller and those impacting the buyer.


Not only does the seller have to devote a wealth of internal resources to the TSA during the process, but they are contractually linked to the buyer after its completion. This means that they could remain responsible for any employees that are no longer a part of their own team. This also includes certain accounting challenges, which compound throughout the transition but do not necessarily end upon its fruition. 


Turning to the buyer, one of their biggest challenges could be a lack of flexibility during the process. For example, they might not inherit complete control over their new employees, and might have to rely on the seller to take responsibility for the hiring of new positions.


Overall, this can lead to a sense of confusion for both parties as to where the boundaries exist between their respective organisations. Because of this, TSAs are most often implemented as a last resort, which only exacerbates stress, costs, and tension in a relationship that will only continue beyond its completion. 

How to Create a Holistic TSA

At Cambridge Management Consulting, our biggest piece of advice for the post-close transition is to start early in order to ascertain whether a TSA is required—as careful and thorough consideration and preparation of all factors is crucial to achieving a holistic TSA.


Due diligence should lead straight into these considerations, and the pre-close teams should hand over any information to the relevant governance office for the transition phase.


Managing a shorter TSA process is a significant factor in controlling costs. Both parties will be keen to avoid a drawn-out transition phase because this eats into value-creation for the buyer and often affects day-to-day operations for the seller—as well as being a huge drain on subject matter experts.


Delegation is also key: buyers should consider out-sourcing administration of services to a trusted third-party if this will shorten the duration of the TSA and save money in the long term.


This is where Cambridge MC is here to help. In the following articles outlining our approach to M&A services, we provide keen and detailed advice on how to construct a properly holistic TSA, covered in these five main areas:

 

  1. How to achieve organisational clarity: to properly understand the inner working of your TSA, including timelines, exit strategies, and how to achieve clear phrasing and detail

  2. The importance of governance and communication: the different roles required to execute a holistic TSA and how to achieve proper communication and cooperation between them

  3. Vendors and Contracts: the different stages involved with vendors and contract management, as well as clarifying the different types of vendor

  4. Culture and People: how to manage the minutiae and maintain the morale of employees throughout the transition

  5. Managing risk: the different issues and conflicts that might arise throughout a TSA, and the key points for mitigating such concerns

Get in Touch


If you would like to find out more about how we can help with any stage of due diligence, drafting your TSA and/or blueprints, as well as our Project Management and PMO as-a-Service, get in touch below.


Contact - Africa

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Blog Subscribe

SHARE CONTENT

Pembroke College lawn bathed in sunlight
by Tim Passingham 12 March 2026
CAMBRIDGE | See how Cambridge MC and Pembroke College are creating mutual value through a unique corporate partnership spanning student opportunities, academic collaboration and industry events | READ FULL CASE STUDY
Neon sharks made out of code.
by Simon Crimp 9 March 2026
Cyber Security | Ransomware in 2026 is a board-level resilience issue. Learn the key risks, weak spots and practical questions boards should ask to improve readiness, recovery and response.
The Top 21.2026 at the awards event in Cambridge, UK.
6 March 2026
The #21toWatch Top21.2026 winners have been announced at an awards ceremony at The Glasshouse innovation hub in Cambridge.
Asian business woman near a long window and looking at a tablet.
by Arianna Mortali 6 March 2026
BLOG | A student’s perspective on why women shouldn’t have to ‘play masculine’ to succeed at work – and how valuing empathy, confidence and inclusive leadership can help close gender gaps and build healthier organisations.
Abstract squiggle of circles
by Simon Crimp 19 February 2026
Where should leaders start with AI in 2026? A practical guide to moving beyond pilots, clarifying risk appetite, strengthening governance, improving data readiness, and delivering measurable enterprise value from AI at scale | READ FULL ARTICLE
Close up of a data centre stack with ports and wires visible
12 February 2026
We were approached by one of the fastest growing data centre providers in Europe. With over 20 data centres throughout the continent, they are consistently meeting the need for scalable, high-performance infrastructure. Despite this, a key data centre in Scandinavia had become reliant on a single, non-redundant 1 Gbps internet service from a local provider, posing significant risks to operational continuity. To enhance the reliability of its network and resolve these risks, our client needed to establish additional connectivity paths to ensure the redundancy of its infrastructure. The Ask Cambridge Management Consulting was engaged to address these connectivity challenges by identifying and evaluating potential vendors and infrastructure options to create second and third connectivity paths. This involved exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre. Additionally, Cambridge MC was asked to provide recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre to control and maintain diverse paths. This would allow the data centre to connect directly to nearby points of presence (PoPs) and reduce dependency on external providers, thereby enhancing network resilience and operational control. The goal of this project was to ensure that the Nordic data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. Approach & Skills Cambridge MC approached the project with a focus on ensuring operational continuity and resilience for the data centre. By identifying multiple connectivity paths, we aimed to mitigate the risk of network failures and ensure that the data centre could maintain continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. This approach allowed Cambridge MC to provide a comprehensive solution to address both immediate and long-term connectivity needs. We employed a combination of Agile and Waterfall methodologies to manage the project. The initial investigative phase allowed a Waterfall approach, in which our team conducted thorough research and analysis to identify potential vendors and connectivity options. This phase involved detailed interviews with various telecommunications providers and an assessment of publicly available information. Once the initial analysis was complete, the workflow transitioned to an Agile approach for the implementation phase. This allowed Cambridge MC to adapt to new information and feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that the final solution was both flexible and robust. Challenges Lack of information: One of the primary obstacles we faced was the lack of detailed network maps and information from some of the potential vendors. To overcome this, the team conducted extensive interviews with contacts at these companies and leveraged its existing network of industry contacts to gather as much information as possible. Remote location: Another challenge was the remote location of the data centre, which limited the availability of local infrastructure and required us to explore creative solutions for connectivity. Cambridge MC addressed this by proposing the construction of a local fibre network around the data centre, which would allow for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby PoPs. Fragmented factors: Additionally, coordinating with multiple vendors and ensuring that their services could be integrated seamlessly posed a logistical challenge. We mitigated this by recommending a phased approach to implementation, starting with the most critical connectivity paths and gradually expanding to include additional options. Outcomes & Results Increased Connectivity: Cambridge MC successfully identified and evaluated multiple connectivity paths for the data centre. By exploring various types of connectivity, including internet access, point-to-point capacity, wavelengths, and dark fibre, we provided a comprehensive solution that significantly enhanced network resilience and reliability. Greater Control & Flexibility: Our recommendations for building a local fibre network around the data centre allowed for greater control and flexibility in connecting to nearby points of presence, ensuring continuous operations even in the event of a failure in the primary connection. New Vendors: The team’s extensive network of industry contacts and deep understanding of the regional telecommunications landscape allowed for a thorough and nuanced evaluation of potential vendors and connectivity options. Scope for Future Work: Cambridge MC identified several future developments with the potential to further enhance international connectivity and provide additional redundancy for the data centre. We also proposed further assistance, including a site visit for a more in-depth analysis of options, issuing RFI/RFP to vendors for capacity and fibre, and conducting similar connectivity studies for other candidate sites in the region.
Neon discs fading from blue to green to purple, cascading diagnolly across the screen.
by Cambridge Management Consulting 28 January 2026
Thames Freeport this week revealed the eight companies selected to participate in the Freeport’s Connectivity Lab, an initiative focused on validating commercially proven technologies in live port and logistics environments.
Aerial view of a data centre warehouse in the English countryside
by Duncan Clubb 13 January 2026
Author
by Matt Lawson 2 January 2026
Emerging as a hub for innovation, Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and transform the lives of people in its region. Leveraging global connectivity and occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to drive economic regeneration for the local area. Thames Freeport engaged Cambridge Management Consulting to design a clear strategy for innovation over the next three to five years. Key considerations for this innovation strategy included objectives and KPIs, the future of the business ecosystem in the region, physical clusters and assets such as innovation hubs, and opportunities and challenges on the way. The Solution Working with our innovation partner, L Marks, Cambridge MC conducted an innovation strategy project which involved the following: Engaging with a range of stakeholders and partners from local authorities to corporate partners across the Thames Freeport area, leveraging interviews with key individuals to build a common picture of innovation aspirations, opportunities, and challenges. Conducting a series of workshops for the Thames Freeport team to consider visions and objectives, themes and focus areas, physical hubs and overall programme structure, and a three-year roadmap plan. Building a comprehensive innovation strategy which internalised all of the above questions. This was then presented to their board and formed the basis of the public tenders for innovation programmes that were then made public. 
More posts